Post by account_disabled on Nov 8, 2023 22:42:05 GMT -5
Additionally, the Office of Competition and Consumer Protection website contains practical explanations regarding the prohibition of competition-restricting practices, according to which: It is prohibited, among others: agreeing on price levels between at least two independent entrepreneurs, associations of entrepreneurs or entrepreneurs and their associations. Therefore, an agreement is any conscious cooperation of entities that should normally compete with each other; The prohibition of competition-restricting agreements applies not only to arrangements between entrepreneurs, but also to the activities of industry associations of entrepreneurs.
Their associations and professional self-governments; For example, the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer philippines photo editor Protection found the provision of the internal regulations of the architects' self-government prohibiting architects from participating in competitions and tenders in which the main selection criterion was price to be competition-restricting; The exchange of information between entrepreneurs is a normal feature of many competitive markets and can result in various benefits for businesses and consumers. However, in some cases this may constitute a violation of antitrust law, leading to restriction of competition and closing access to the market for entrepreneurs who do not participate in the exchange of information.
Setting target prices between the manufacturer supplier and distributors is, in principle, contrary to competition law. However, the assessment of such agreements may vary, depending on whether they are fixed, minimum, recommended suggested or maximum prices. What about court decisions? Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of March. The following cannot be considered "trivial" among others: price and tender collusion as well as sharing and quota agreements, which by their nature are always prohibited as harmful to competition.
Their associations and professional self-governments; For example, the President of the Office of Competition and Consumer philippines photo editor Protection found the provision of the internal regulations of the architects' self-government prohibiting architects from participating in competitions and tenders in which the main selection criterion was price to be competition-restricting; The exchange of information between entrepreneurs is a normal feature of many competitive markets and can result in various benefits for businesses and consumers. However, in some cases this may constitute a violation of antitrust law, leading to restriction of competition and closing access to the market for entrepreneurs who do not participate in the exchange of information.
Setting target prices between the manufacturer supplier and distributors is, in principle, contrary to competition law. However, the assessment of such agreements may vary, depending on whether they are fixed, minimum, recommended suggested or maximum prices. What about court decisions? Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Warsaw of March. The following cannot be considered "trivial" among others: price and tender collusion as well as sharing and quota agreements, which by their nature are always prohibited as harmful to competition.